tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4309271349234878960.post1025019534810091726..comments2023-05-14T05:53:33.537-07:00Comments on Rational Science Blog: Mathematical Physics is Irrational (Video)Mike Hhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05956442265347654942noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4309271349234878960.post-69252547318794192272013-05-01T23:37:18.195-07:002013-05-01T23:37:18.195-07:00How can you define 'thing' and 'exist&...How can you define 'thing' and 'exist' separately?henk korbeehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00980854278183124249noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4309271349234878960.post-11247058987064096202013-01-10T07:10:21.115-08:002013-01-10T07:10:21.115-08:00Upon my initial read through of reism, I can see h...Upon my initial read through of reism, I can see how you would think that Rational Science & reism are similar, however, they do have some extreme differences.<br /><br />Reism never bothers to define the term existence. They just say, "Things exist." I define each term, thing and exist, separately.<br /><br />Also, reism holds that the only ontological category is that of objects (things). I disagree again, there are TWO fundamental ontological categories: objects AND concepts.<br /><br />Objects are that which has shape, concepts are relations b/t objects.Mike Hhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05956442265347654942noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4309271349234878960.post-62538764849488080102013-01-01T06:10:44.418-08:002013-01-01T06:10:44.418-08:00Are you familiar with Tadeusz Kotarbinski's wo...Are you familiar with Tadeusz Kotarbinski's work? His theory is called reism. It's basically a logical/praxeological approach to science.<br /><br />http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reism/<br />http://www.ontology.co/kotarbinskit.htm<br /><br />B-64 on FDRB-64https://www.blogger.com/profile/01617338296205671114noreply@blogger.com